Again, I ask, what evidence or record is there of the supposed defection? I do not see any. The Watchtower is a known false prophetic body that falsely prophesied the coming of Christ multiple times, changing dates along the way. Nothing can be trusted from such a corrupt institution.

JoseG.
Your point is very WELL taken ! In fact,I defer to the warning at Rev. 22:18! In all due respect for the operation of Holy Spirit,please scrutinize[below]:

Gabriel's being a formidable enemy of The New Jerusalem will be the subject of this discourse...Though admittedly, Gabriel's rebellion was not mentioned in the Bible...;it must be noted that his defection occurred 1200 years after completion of the Bible canon!{circa 1300 C.E-the first Holy Year} Cynics will say that Jehovah's Witnesses and similar "religious fanatics" quote scriptures,only to substantiate their views ;well,didn't Christ quote the Hebrew scriptures frequently ?:.."it is written"? As Christ,himself exclaimed:he did not speak of his own originality{John 7:17,18} ;we imitate Christ in that respect {John 14:10} In this respect,let's imitate the Boreans at Acts 17:11! {important interjection}
Only through approach to New Jerusalem can the True Knowledge be confirmed!{Daniel 12:4} During these last days,.."Scrolls are Opened";the 1958 publication :"Your Will Be Done Earth",correctly interprets Daniel's prophecy which has been "unsealed" during this Time of the End! From the Bible at Rev 5:5,we realize that the ..Lamb that was slain ,was the only one worthy to open the sealed scroll…'!

OK - that's a start. What specific scriptural references do you have for this? Please be concise.

Hello,JoseG.
Thanks for your reply! I must admit,since the lengthy Intro was in the Apositive{for a reason}the Crux of the message is that Gabriel [allied with Satan since the later Middle Ages] is an Archenemy of The New Jerusalem!
This chief Advocate of the False Prophet's propaganda created "the Society",a witches coven,and perverted mockery of Theocracy!

Thank you for sending this, Jim. But, once I saw a CLEAR misquoting of 1 Th 4:16 right at the beginning of this rather lengthy post, I had no interest in proceeding. I would be more that happy to engage one issue at a time. This is an impossible post to reply to otherwise, since there is so much heresay and mistranslation throughout.

Is there a specific issue you want to talk about?

Regarding Michael being Jesus, Hebrews 1:5-8 draws a clear distinction between Jesus and the angels, "For to which of the angels did God ever say, 'You are my Son; today I have become your Father’? Or again, 'I will be His Father, and He will be my Son'? And again, when God brings His firstborn into the world, He says, 'Let all God's angels worship Him.' In speaking of the angels He says, 'He makes his angels winds, his servants flames of fire.’ But about the Son He says, 'Your throne, O God, will last forever and ever, and righteousness will be the scepter of your kingdom.'"

So, again, what specifically would you like to debate?

[Post Unavailable]